Overview

Currently, I have implemented local cache update with server data when app is killed using Push Notification and Notification Service Extension. So it works even the app is killed by the user, but I wanted to know whether this is app review safe work around or not as I am not finding any documentation for this.

The sysEx struct in the MIDIUniversalMessage struct has a channel member but the System Exclusive (7-Bit) Message doesn't have a channel field. The System Exclusive (7-Bit) Message has a # of bytes field but the sysEx struct doesn't have a nrOfBytes, byteCount or bytesUsed member. It looks like the channel member of the sysEx struct contains the number of used bytes. Is this a mistake in the header or did I misunderstand something?

J’ai juste une question! Est ce qu'il pourrais y avoir un genre de rabais pour le temps des fêtes ou quelque chose comme ça? (Suggestion pour le programme/à ajouter peut être).

Need to vent a bit before relaxing for Christmas... WatchOS IAP using Storekit 2 is such a mess...is nobody actually using this or does Apple just not care for the user experience here? Lots of users experience after the purchase confirmation double tap on the side button an instant return to the purchase screen with nothing actually happening. No error message whatsoever. There is just one remedy: users need to unpair and re-pair their watch, including restoring a backup and setting up their wallet again. Nobody really wants to do this, or doesn't believe me and think this is just typical support BS, because their watch is paired and most things just work as they expect. And it turns away a customer, often leaving a bad review. And I can't do anything about it. Other errors in the purchase process are reported, but like "process interrupted" in case the payment is not setup correctly (credit car no longer valid or sth.). How should the user know? There must be better ways of letting him know what exactly the problem is. You need to implement a "Restore Purchase" function, otherwise you're not passing the review. But it really asks every time for the AppStore password, and users with crazy passwords -- that they rightfully should have! -- have almost no chance of typing them successfully on the tiny AW keyboard. Why is it not also just a side button double tap like for purchase? At the very least you would need access to the keychain PWs or allow pasting of sth. copied on the paired iPhone. Promo Codes for IAP on AW-only apps just don't work. AW has no redemption at all, and on the iPhone the AppStore will try to talk to a companion app (which AW-only doesn't have) and the end up in a dead-end installation effort. This all feels like never really tested in the field, and people are of course blaming the 3rd party dev. for all these issues. And opening a ticket is just leading nowhere -- at best it's closed after months with the hint "duplicate" but w/o any chance for me to see that one that they then actually work on and track progress. It's all so frustratingly broken...

Hi everyone, I am looking for guidance regarding a rejection under Guideline 3.1.1 – Payments / In-App Purchase. Our app is a **B2B SaaS platform for professional fitness coaches. Coaches subscribe through our website to access coaching management tools (client tracking, training programs, nutrition planning, messaging, etc.). The iOS app is only a companion app that lets existing coach accounts log in and access services they already purchased on the web. Important facts about our implementation: No subscriptions can be purchased in the app No pricing, plans, or commercial upsell screens in the app No sign-up in the app No external links to a website checkout or pricing The app is not usable at all without an existing paid account The content is professional B2B data, not consumer digital media Despite this, App Review keeps rejecting us for: “Your app accesses digital content purchased outside the app, and that content is not available through in-app purchase.” We tried referencing **3.1.3(b) Multiplatform Services, because our service is used on the web and mobile, and we only allow access with an existing account. We also provided examples of other coaching platforms in the App Store that appear to work the same way (Trainerize, Everfit for Coaches, Hubfit, etc.). But App Review still says the same thing, without pointing to a specific screen or UI element. I want to make sure we comply. To clarify: Do we need to completely block access to all content until login, even if the app already does this? Is it enough to display a disclaimer such as: “This app is for existing coach accounts only. No purchases, subscriptions, or account creation are available in the app.” For a B2B tool, does Apple still require In-App Purchase, even if users cannot sign up or buy anything inside the app? Is this considered a Reader-style app under Apple’s rules? Has anyone successfully passed review with a SaaS “login-only” model for professional software? We don’t want to violate any rule, we just need clear guidance on what is required to get approval. Any help or experience from other developers or Apple team members would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Robin

I am trying to add promotional offers in my iOS App. The signature is being verified through a google cloud function. My user id, signature, and product and offerIds return perfect. Promotional offer appears in the payment sheet as well. When applying for payment, the "ding" sound comes as well. But then I get the UIAlert with Unable to Purchase Contact developer. Error code in logs is 3903

I have a Mac application that uses the NSEvent.addLocalMonitorForEvents API to receive all mouse movement events. It receives all the mouse movement events and calculate the event reporting rate. The code used as following: import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { VStack { Image(systemName: "globe") .imageScale(.large) .foregroundColor(.accentColor) Text("Hello, world!") } .frame(width: 400, height: 400) .padding() .onAppear() { // here NSEvent.addLocalMonitorForEvents(matching: [.mouseMoved]) { event in print(event.timestamp) return event } } } } With the exact same code, before I upgraded my macOS to the latest version 26.2, I could receive approximately 460+ mouse events per second, this matched the hardware reporting frequency of my mouse device perfectly. However, after upgrading to version 26.2, I noticed that the number of mouse events received per second is limited to match the screen refresh rate: when I set the screen refresh rate to 60Hz, I only receive 60 mouse events per second; when set to 120Hz, I receive 120 events per second. It is clear that some changes has be delivered in macOS 26.2, which by default downsamples the frequency of mouse events reported to applications to align with the screen refresh rate. The question is how can I reteive all the original mouse events in macOS 26.2? I tried to search and dig, bug no any related APIs found.

Hello everyone, I achieved my MacOs app and distributed for "App Store Connect" and I already have setup the Product In App Purchase in the App Store connect, and I even tested the purchase flow using the local .storekit file using the "Edit Schema". And now, when I remove the edit scema's storekit file and archieved the app and used the Internal testing and installed the app using Testflight, I see that the product is not showing, an empty product array is being returned and there is no option to purchase. I don't want to sumit the full app until I test the StoreKit integration in real test

I can't enrol in apple developer program, every time i click enrol i got this message: "Your enrollement in tha Apple Developer Program could not be completed at this time"

I'm trying to debug an issue with the Valgrind tool Helgrind. This is on masOS 11 (I've also seen it on 12, probably the same for other macOS versions). Here is the testcase. #include <pthread.h> #include <string.h> #include <assert.h> #include <errno.h> int main(void) { pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; pthread_cond_t cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; int res; // This time has most definitely passed already. (Epoch) struct timespec now; memset(&now, 0, sizeof(now)); res = pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); assert(res == 0); res = pthread_cond_timedwait(&cond, &mutex, &now); assert(res == ETIMEDOUT); res = pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); assert(res == 0); res = pthread_mutex_destroy(&mutex); assert(res == 0); res = pthread_cond_destroy(&cond); assert(res == 0); } The error that I'm getting from Helgrind is ==56754== Thread #1 unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x1048C7A08 ==56754== at 0x10020E2F9: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:1255) ==56754== by 0x10020E278: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:1278) ==56754== by 0x7FF80F526813: _pthread_cond_wait (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib) ==56754== by 0x10020E812: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:1465) ==56754== by 0x10020E6A8: pthread_cond_timedwait (hg_intercepts.c:1512) ==56754== by 0x100003DD2: main (cond_timedwait_test.c:18) ==56754== Lock at 0x1048C7A08 was first observed ==56754== at 0x10020DE91: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:1009) ==56754== by 0x10020DD68: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:1031) ==56754== by 0x100003D7D: main (cond_timedwait_test.c:16) ==56754== Address 0x1048c7a08 is on thread #1's stack ==56754== in frame #5, created by main (cond_timedwait_test.c:7) If I turn on extra tracing then on FreeBSD the Helgrind pthread traces correspond to the C source. On macOS I see an extra mutex. << pthread_mxlock 0x7ff850c41 :: mxlock -> 0 >> << pthread_mxunlk 0x7ff850c41 :: mxunlk -> 0 >> ^^ I don't know what this mutex is << pthread_mxlock 0x1048c7a08 :: mxlock -> 0 >> ^^ this is the user mutex << pthread_mxlock 0x7ff850c41 :: mxlock -> 0 >> << pthread_cond_timedwait 0x1048c79d8 0x1048c7a08 0x1048c79c0<< pthread_mxunlk 0x7ff850c41 :: mxunlk -> 0 >> ^^ pthread_cond_timedwait unlocking the non-user mutex << pthread_mxlock 0x7ff850c41 :: mxlock -> 0 >> << pthread_mxunlk 0x7ff850c41 :: mxunlk -> 0 >> << pthread_mxunlk 0x1048c7a08 [error here] :: mxunlk -> 0 >> << pthread_mxlock 0x1048c7a08 :: mxlock -> 0 >> << pthread_mxlock 0x7ff850c41 :: mxlock -> 0 >> cotimedwait -> 60 >> In these traces the "-> 0" is the return code, showing that all of the calls succeeded. I need to do more debugging inside Helgrind. In the traces above I only see the user mutex being locked and then unlocked. Can anyone explain why I'm seeing an extra mutex in there? I'll have a poke around the XNU source

On macOS Tahoe, our application using the Endpoint Security Framework (ESF) observes that during file copies through finder application, DesktopServicesHelper unlinks the source file if the ESF authorization response is delayed for ~5 seconds, even though the authorization event deadline remains 15 seconds, indicating that the process does not wait for the full ESF deadline before deleting the file. Before Tahoe, we didnt see this behaviour.

Description: When following Apple's WWDC guidance to hide the default Liquid Glass background on a ToolbarItem using .sharedBackgroundVisibility(.hidden) and draw a custom circular progress ring, a rectangular rendering artifact appears during navigation bar transition animations (e.g., when the navigation bar dims/fades during a push/pop transition). Steps to Reproduce: Create a ToolbarItem with a custom circular view (e.g., a progress ring using Circle().trim().stroke()). Apply .sharedBackgroundVisibility(.hidden) to hide the default Liquid Glass background. Navigate to a detail view (triggering a navigation bar transition animation). Observe the ToolbarItem during the transition. Expected Result: The custom circular view should transition smoothly without any visual artifacts. Actual Result: A rectangular bounding box artifact briefly appears around the custom view during the navigation bar's dimming/transition animation. The artifact disappears after the transition completes. Attempts to Resolve (All Failed): Using .frame(width: 44, height: 44) with .aspectRatio(1, contentMode: .fit) Using .fixedSize() instead of explicit frame Using Circle().fill() as a base view with .overlay for content Using Button with .buttonStyle(.plain) and Color.clear placeholder Various combinations of .clipShape(Circle()), .contentShape(Circle()), .mask(Circle()) Workaround Found (Trade-off): Removing .sharedBackgroundVisibility(.hidden) eliminates the rectangular artifact, but this prevents customizing the Liquid Glass appearance as intended by the API. Code Sample: swift if #available(iOS 26.0, *) { ToolbarItem { Button { // action } label: { Color.clear .frame(width: 32, height: 32) .overlay { ZStack { // Background arc (3/4 circle) Circle() .trim(from: 0, to: 0.75) .stroke(Color.blue.opacity(0.3), style: StrokeStyle(lineWidth: 4, lineCap: .round)) .rotationEffect(.degrees(135)) .frame(width: 28, height: 28) // Progress arc Circle() .trim(from: 0, to: 0.5) // Example: 50% progress .stroke(Color.blue, style: StrokeStyle(lineWidth: 4, lineCap: .round)) .rotationEffect(.degrees(135)) .frame(width: 28, height: 28) Text("50") .font(.system(size: 12, weight: .bold)) .foregroundStyle(Color.blue) Text("100") .font(.system(size: 8, weight: .bold)) .foregroundStyle(.primary) .offset(y: 12) } .background { Circle() .fill(.clear) .glassEffect(.clear.interactive(), in: Circle()) } } } .buttonStyle(.plain) } .sharedBackgroundVisibility(.hidden) // ⚠️ This modifier causes the rectangular artifact during transitions } Environment: iOS 26 Beta

Problem Description: After upgrading to iOS 26, I discovered that the ExtendedDistanceMeasurement feature in the Nearby Interaction framework is not working as expected. On the same device model, the issue did not occur on iOS 18, but it is present on iOS 26 (including the latest iOS 26.2), and it has started affecting the functionality of my app. I hope this issue can be resolved as soon as possible. Problem Details: On iOS 26 and later versions (including iOS 26.2), when using an iPhone and an Apple Watch both equipped with second-generation UWB chips, enabling isExtendedDistanceMeasurementEnabled initiates the distance measurement process successfully, but the distance information fails to update. The real-time distance between the devices does not display within the app. Affected Devices and Versions: iPhone Model: iPhone 15 Pro Max iOS Version: iOS 26.2 Apple Watch Model: Apple Watch 10 watchOS Version: 26.2 Example Code: The issue can be reproduced by adding the following code from the official sample code: Nearby Interaction Framework Sample Code

Problem Description: After upgrading to iOS 26, I discovered that the ExtendedDistanceMeasurement feature in the Nearby Interaction framework is not working as expected. On the same device model, the issue did not occur on iOS 18, but it is present on iOS 26 (including the latest iOS 26.2), and it has started affecting the functionality of my app. I hope this issue can be resolved as soon as possible. Problem Details: On iOS 26 and later versions (including iOS 26.2), when using an iPhone and an Apple Watch both equipped with second-generation UWB chips, enabling isExtendedDistanceMeasurementEnabled initiates the distance measurement process successfully, but the distance information fails to update. The real-time distance between the devices does not display within the app. Affected Devices and Versions: iPhone Model: iPhone 15 Pro Max iOS Version: iOS 26.2 Apple Watch Model: Apple Watch 10 watchOS Version: 26.2 Example Code: The issue can be reproduced by adding the following code to the official sample code: Nearby Interaction Framework Sample Code private func didReceiveDiscoveryToken(_ token: NIDiscoveryToken) { if session == nil { initializeNISession() } if !didSendDiscoveryToken { sendDiscoveryToken() } os_log("running NISession with peer token: \(token)") let config = NINearbyPeerConfiguration(peerToken: token) // The issue can be reproduced by adding the following code to the official sample code // Enable extended distance measurement if both devices support it if NISession.deviceCapabilities.supportsExtendedDistanceMeasurement && token.deviceCapabilities.supportsExtendedDistanceMeasurement { config.isExtendedDistanceMeasurementEnabled = true } session?.run(config) } Problem Behavior: When either the iPhone or the Apple Watch does not support the second-generation UWB chip (i.e., deviceCapabilities.supportsExtendedDistanceMeasurement = false), the code works as expected. However, when both the iPhone and the Apple Watch support the second-generation UWB chip (i.e., deviceCapabilities.supportsExtendedDistanceMeasurement = true), the code fails to work, and the distance does not update — meaning the real-time distance between the devices is not displayed. Expectation: I hope this issue can be resolved soon, as it is impacting my app. The problem persists in the latest iOS 26.2, and has yet to be fixed.

I need to install the AirPlay profile on an iphone to watch decrypted traffic in ATS for development work on CarPlay. The documentation for ATS says to click "Utilities -> Download Profiles -> AirPlay Diagnostic Mode". When I do this, it brings up a file dialog, presumably to select a location to download. But nothing happens. The other profiles launch a web browser and download the .mobileconfig profile. How do I get the AirPlay profile? Am I misunderstanding how this is supposed to work? I found ATSAssetsInfoDefault.plist which references these files. And they all have https://developer.apple.com/services-account/download?path=/iOS/iOS_Logs/... except the AirPlay profile, which is type "slug" and just says ats-airplay-diagnostic-mode-profile. Is this a bug in the app?

We are facing a UI layout issue while using VisionKit (VNDocumentCameraViewController) for document scanning. After capturing a document, an unexpected extra blank space appears above the “Retake” and “Keep” action bar also in Bottom. This extra space is not part of our custom UI and seems to be introduced by VisionKit itself. This issue impacts the final scan preview layout and reduces usable screen space, especially noticeable on devices all the device iPhone or iPad

Hey All, Registering using DUNS number wrt to Organisation. After filling Signatory Details and Clicking on Proceed to Purchase, “an unexpected error has occurred…”. shows up. Tried contacting apple support no reply. can any one help?

Hi, I am building an app that depends on multiple iOS devices connecting to a designated "coordinator" iOS device. I am using MPC, and it works great when the devices are connected to the same WiFi AP, with virtually 100% connection success. My definition of success is a near instant detection of available devices, >95% connection success rate, and a stable ongoing connection with no unexpected disconnects. The issue arises when the devices are not connected to the same WiFi network (or connected to no network with WiFi and bluetooth still on). Devices detect each other immediately, but when initiating a connection, both devices initiate a handshake, but the connection is not successful. In the few times where the connection succeeds, the connection quality is high, stable, and doesn't drop. Is this a known limitation of the framework? Could I be doing something wrong in my implementation?

直播过程中需同时操作 Vision Pro（拍摄）、Mac（推流）、中控台（画面切换），无统一控制入口，调节 3D 模型、校准画质等操作需在多设备间切换，易出错且效率低。 期望 针对直播场景，提供桌面端专属控制软件，支持一站式管理 Vision Pro 的拍摄参数、3D 模型切换、虚实融合效果等，实现多设备协同操作的可视化、便捷化。

画面亮度存在无规律动态波动（时亮时暗），且无手动控制入口，导致商品颜色还原失真、主播面部曝光异常（过曝 / 欠曝），严重影响直播展示效果。 期望 "· 优化直播模式的自动曝光算法，提升复杂光线环境下的亮度稳定性； · 增加 “直播模式” 专属亮度锁定功能，支持手动设定亮度参数并锁定，满足直播场景下的画质可控需求。 "