Overview

Not accepted yet (all are still processing, none are rejected) 387af103-42d3-4d95-ae22-0289f90a8559 — In Progress 2d836594-9fb2-41a5-990c-7ea4e0870af0 — In Progress e61ba9e3-5ff1-4856-8e9d-39c08445ff63 — In Progress 1defdeec-50b4-45c5-b32d-53ca6e4538bb — In Progress 34e60b80-20c3-4ea7-93a7-2bb9e7c6f05c — In Progress 09222b71-eae1-4c5c-aca4-368f697b2a39 — In Progress eb5327e8-161e-4185-9920-3facf60b7b4b — In Progress 784fc210-d0bf-4924-b0a6-eb8bbac0f2c8 — In Progress 74bc8f31-b1b0-4bed-9142-0c03100a062a — In Progress 4739620c-894a-4283-a43b-df57b29a1771 — In Progress have created new certificate as well same result. waiting for apple support to give any answers.

My application installs a system extension. When I try to remove the app from the Applications folder (cmd + backspace) I get an error message: "The operation can’t be completed right now because another operation is in progress, such as moving or copying an item or emptying the Bin." According to systemextensionsctl the extension state is "terminating for uninstall but still running". I can see an error in the console logs: kernelmanagerd Failed to terminate dext com.my.driver-dk, error: Kernel request failed: (os/kern) invalid address (1) sysextd a category delegate declined to terminate extension with identifier: com.my.driver-dk sysextd failed to terminate extension with identifier: com.my.driver-dk: Optional(Error Domain=kernelmanagerd.KMError Code=38 "(null)") Issue occurs with macOS 13 - works fine with macOS 12 and macOS 11 What is the problem here? Have there been any changes in macOS in that regard?

I’m building a macOS app with a DNS Proxy system extension for Developer ID + notarization, deployed via MDM, and Xcode fails the Developer ID Release build with a provisioning profile mismatch for com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension. Environment macOS: Sequoia (15.7.2) Xcode: 26.2 Distribution: Developer ID + notarization, deployed via MDM Host bundle ID: com.mydns.agent.MyDNSMacProxy DNS Proxy system extension bundle ID: com.mydns.agent.MyDNSMacProxy.dnsProxy Host entitlements (Release): File: MyDNSMacProxy/MyDNSMacProxyRelease.entitlements: "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>com.apple.application-identifier</key> <string>B234657989.com.mydns.agent.MyDNSMacProxy</string> <key>com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension</key> <array> <string>dns-proxy</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.system-extension.install</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key> <string>B234657989</string> <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.mydns.MyDNSmac</string> </array> <key>keychain-access-groups</key> <array> <string>B234657989.*</string> </array> </dict> </plist> xcodebuild -showBuildSettings -scheme MyDNSMacProxy -configuration Release : PROVISIONING_PROFILE_SPECIFIER = main MyDNSMacProxy5 CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY = Developer ID Application Host Developer ID profile main_MyDNSMacProxy5.provisionprofile (via security cms -D): "Entitlements" => { "com.apple.application-identifier" => "B234657989.com.mydns.agent.MyDNSMacProxy" "com.apple.developer.team-identifier" => "B234657989" "com.apple.security.application-groups" => [ "group.com.mydns.MyDNSmac", ..., "B234657989.*" ] "keychain-access-groups" => [ "B234657989.*" ] "com.apple.developer.system-extension.install" => 1 "com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension" => [ "packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension", "app-proxy-provider-systemextension", "content-filter-provider-systemextension", "dns-proxy-systemextension", "dns-settings", "relay", "url-filter-provider", "hotspot-provider" ] } So: App ID, team ID, keychain and system‑extension.install match. The profile’s com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension is a superset of what I request in the host entitlements (dns-proxy only). System extension (for context) DNS Proxy system extension target: NSExtensionPointIdentifier = com.apple.dns-proxy NetworkExtension → NEProviderClasses → com.apple.networkextension.dns-proxy → my provider class Entitlements: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = ["dns-proxy-systemextension"] This target uses a separate Developer ID profile and builds successfully. Xcode error Release build of the host fails with: …MyDNSMacProxy.xcodeproj: error: Provisioning profile "main MyDNSMacProxy5" doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement. (in target 'MyDNSMacProxy' from project 'MyDNSMacProxy') Xcode UI also says: Entitlements: 6 Included, 1 Missing Includes com.apple.developer.team-identifier, com.apple.application-identifier, keychain-access-groups, com.apple.developer.system-extension.install, and com.apple.security.application-groups. Doesn’t match entitlements file value for com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension. Because of this, the app bundle isn’t produced and I can’t inspect the final signed entitlements. Questions: For com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension, should Xcode accept a subset of values in the entitlements (here just dns-proxy) as long as that value is allowed by the Developer ID profile, or does it currently require a stricter match? Is the following configuration valid for Developer ID + MDM with a DNS Proxy system extension: Host entitlements: ["dns-proxy"] System extension entitlements: ["dns-proxy-systemextension"] Host profile’s NE array includes the DNS Proxy system extension types. If this is a known limitation or bug in how Xcode validates NE entitlements for Developer ID, is there a recommended workaround? Thanks for any guidance.

I have a Menu in a Toolbar (specifically, the .bottomBar). If I open the menu quickly after it appears (within a few seconds), it flies to the top of the screen. I've created a minimum woking example below. This appears to be a pretty glaring iOS 26 bug that has been present since the early betas, but I can't seem to find much discussion about it (apart from this post from 8 months ago), so I'm wondering if I might be doing something wrong. Or maybe someone managed to figure out a workaround. If the Menu is very simple (just Text items), it seems to be okay. But if the Menu is even slightly complex (e.g. includes icons), then it exhibits the flying behavior. I've also been able to reproduce this bug under different types of navigation component (e.g. NavigationSplitView). I'm seeing this behavior in the current version of iOS (26.2.1), both on device and in the simulator. MWE struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { NavigationStack { VStack { NavigationLink("Go to Detail") { DetailView() } } .navigationTitle("Root") } } } struct DetailView: View { var body: some View { VStack { Text("Detail View") } .navigationTitle("Detail") .navigationBarTitleDisplayMode(.inline) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .bottomBar) { Menu { Button { } label: { Label("Delete", systemImage: "trash") } } label: { Image(systemName: "ellipsis.circle") } } } } }

Hello, We are implementing a Transparent Proxy using NETransparentProxyProvider and configuring NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings with NENetworkRule. Currently, NENetworkRule requires: NENetworkRule( destinationHost: NWHostEndpoint(hostname: String, port: String), protocol: .TCP / .UDP / .any ) NWHostEndpoint.port accepts only a single port value (as a String) or an empty string for all ports. At present, we are creating a separate NENetworkRule for each port in the range (ex for range 49152–65535 approximately 16,384 rules). After deploying this configuration, we observe the following behavior: nesessionmanager starts consuming very high CPU (near 100%) The system becomes unresponsive The device eventually hangs and restarts automatically The behavior resembles a kernel panic scenario This strongly suggests that creating thousands of NENetworkRule entries may not be a supported or scalable approach. Questions: Is there any officially supported way to specify a port range in NENetworkRule? Is creating thousands of rules (one per port) considered acceptable or supported? Is the recommended design to intercept broadly (e.g., port = "") and filter port ranges inside handleNewTCPFlow / handleNewUDPFlow instead? Are there documented system limits for the number of NENetworkRule entries allowed in NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings?

How to legally and compliantly upload users' fitness and health data to our own server—while adhering to Apple's strict privacy policies—for analysis by our AI large model to provide personalized feedback and recommendations to users.

I can't seem to find information on this but this is causing a critical bug where the Strong Password suggestion sheet presents on any secure field (UIKit) and clears the others when closing it. This means the user cannot enter a password when there is a secure confirm password field because switching fields clears the other. This looks to be a recent issue but I can't tell when this was introduced or if this is SDK / OS version related. I am finding it in both Xcode 26.2 and 16.4 when running on device (iOS 26.2.1 and XC 26 simulators). Code to reproduce: class ViewController: UIViewController { override func loadView() { let v = UIStackView() v.axis = .vertical v.layoutMargins = .init(top: 16, left: 16, bottom: 16, right: 16) v.isLayoutMarginsRelativeArrangement = true view = v let t1 = UITextField() t1.textContentType = .username t1.placeholder = "Username" v.addArrangedSubview(t1) let t2 = UITextField() t2.isSecureTextEntry = true t2.textContentType = .newPassword t2.placeholder = "Password" t2.clearsOnInsertion = false t2.clearsOnBeginEditing = false t2.passwordRules = nil t2.clearButtonMode = .always v.addArrangedSubview(t2) let t3 = UITextField() t3.isSecureTextEntry = true t3.textContentType = .newPassword t3.placeholder = "Confirm Password" t3.clearsOnInsertion = false t3.clearsOnBeginEditing = false t3.passwordRules = nil t3.clearButtonMode = .always v.addArrangedSubview(t3) v.addArrangedSubview(UIView()) } } No matter what textContentType is used the strong password still forcefully breaks the flow and blocks the user.

Hi, I’m implementing a NetworkExtension content filter provider on iOS and I can’t get it to activate on device. I have an iOS app (App Store distribution) with a content filter provider extension (NEFilterDataProvider). The app builds, installs, and runs fine, and the extension is embedded correctly. Entitlements appear to be set for both the app and the extension, and the extension’s Info.plist is configured as expected. However, when I try to enable the filter via NEFilterManager (loadFromPreferences → set configuration → isEnabled = true → saveToPreferences), saveToPreferences fails with NEFilterErrorDomain code 1 and the message “Configuration invalid or read/write failed.” The extension never starts and startFilter() is never called. Main app bundle ID: uk.co.getnovi.student Extension bundle ID: uk.co.getnovi.student.NoviContentFilter Extension type: NEFilterDataProvider We are testing on an iPhone 15 running iOS 18.6.2 (22G100), the app is designed to run on iPhone. This app is intended for education use on student-owned personal iPhones installed from the App Store. The devices we are testing on are not supervised and not enrolled in MDM. We already use the Family Controls framework (ManagedSettings) for app restrictions and have the com.apple.developer.family-controls entitlement enabled for App Store distribution. I’ve read TN3134 and noticed content filter providers on iOS are described as “supervised devices only” in general, with additional notes around iOS 15.0 for “apps using Screen Time APIs” and iOS 16.0 for “per-app on managed devices,” plus a note that in the Screen Time case content filters are only supported on child devices. My question is whether this error is what you’d expect when attempting to enable a content filter provider on a non-supervised, non-managed device, or whether this should still work if the entitlement and configuration are correct. If non-supervised devices are not supported, is there any supported path for enabling NEFilter on iOS without supervision/MDM (for example via the Screen Time / Family Controls child authorization pathway), or will the system always refuse to enable the filter on standard devices? In summary: is NEFilterDataProvider supported on non-supervised devices for consumer App Store apps, or is this a platform restriction that cannot be worked around? Thanks, Matt

It seems to me that NSStagedMigrationManager has algorithmic issues. It doesn't perform staged migration, if all its stages are NSLightweightMigrationStage. You can try it yourself. There is a test project with three model versions V1, V2, V3, V4. Migrating V1->V2 is compatible with lightweight migration, V2->V3, V3->V4 is also compatible, but V1->V3 is not. I have following output: Migrating V1->V2, error: nil Migrating V2->V3, error: nil Migrating V3->V4, error: nil Migrating V1->V3, no manager, error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") Migrating V1->V3, lightweight[1, 2, 3], error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") Migrating V1->V3, lightweight[1]->lightweight[2]->lightweight[3], error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") Migrating V1->V3, custom[1->2]->lightweight[3], error: nil Migrating V1->V3, lightweight[1]->custom[2->3], error: nil Migrating V1->V3, custom[1->2]->custom[2->3], error: nil Migrating V1->V4, error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") Migrating V2->V4, error: nil Migrating V1->V4, custom[1->2]->lightweight[3, 4], error: nil Migrating V1->V4, lightweight[3, 4]->custom[1->2], error: Optional("A store file cannot be migrated backwards with staged migration.") Migrating V1->V4, lightweight[1, 2]->lightweight[3, 4], error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") Migrating V1->V4, lightweight[1]->custom[2->3]->lightweight[4], error: nil Migrating V1->V4, lightweight[1,4]->custom[2->3], error: nil Migrating V1->V4, custom[2->3]->lightweight[1,4], error: Optional("Persistent store migration failed, missing mapping model.") I think that staged migration should satisfy the following rules for two consecutive stages: Any version of lightweight stage to any version of lightweight stage; Any version of lightweight stage to current version of custom stage; Next version of custom stage to any version of lightweight stage; Next version of custom stage to current version of custom stage. However, rule 1 doesn't work, because migration manager skips intermediate versions if they are inside lightweight stages, even different ones. Note that lightweight[3, 4]->custom[1->2] doesn't work, lightweight[1,4]->custom[2->3] works, but custom[2->3]->lightweight[1,4] doesn't work again. Would like to hear your opinion on that, especially, from Core Data team, if possible. Thanks!

Hi! I have a Catalyst app that embeds command line utility. So the project has two targets: Catalyst target, this target depends on #2 and embeds it into its bundle. macOS target, the command line tool. Both targets have package dependency to the same package. I used this to embed the CMD tool. Everything builds, runs and works fine until I try to archive the project. Archiving stops early with such error: error: Multiple commands produce '/Users/kse2/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/PkgTest-clngkndczxoprpdlwefqqiqlryjt/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/PkgTest/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/UninstalledProducts/macosx/MacrosForSwift.o' note: Target 'MacrosForSwift' (project 'MacrosForSwift') has a command with output '/Users/kse2/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/PkgTest-clngkndczxoprpdlwefqqiqlryjt/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/PkgTest/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/UninstalledProducts/macosx/MacrosForSwift.o' note: Target 'MacrosForSwift' (project 'MacrosForSwift') has a command with output '/Users/kse2/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/PkgTest-clngkndczxoprpdlwefqqiqlryjt/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/PkgTest/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/UninstalledProducts/macosx/MacrosForSwift.o' What I have tried to fix archiving: Changing PkgTestCMD target to be on Catalyst/iOS instead of macOS. This works but I'm not sure how to properly run CMD tool with iOS SDK (if this correct at all): I need the main thread to be 'unblocked' and be active while background tasks exist. Adding an aux framework that act as container for the package. Doesn't work. Splitting targets into different projects, making workspace and cross-project reference. Doesn't work. My understanding is that archiving attempts to produce .o files for both Catalyst and macOS simultaneously, due to PkgTest being Catalyst and PkgTestCMD being macOS targets. How to archive such a project? Is there a way to separate archiving of CMD and main app? Maybe separate .o files into different directories. Simple building and running the project works, why archiving doesn't want to? I have a test project for the issue: PkgTest. main branch is the source project, DepFramework contains attempt #2, Workspace—#3. Thank you!

Background: My app uses a third-party SDK for payments, and it uses Original StoreKit internally for IAP payments. Now I'm getting ready to migrate to StoreKit2, and during the transition, users may use either method to initiate payments, and there's no way to avoid the coexistence of StoreKit2 and Original StoreKit. Problem: When a user has an unfinished transaction, if the app is restarted, both StoreKit2 and Original StoreKit will receive a notification of the transaction: Original StoreKit's '-paymentQueue:updatedTransactions:' method StoreKit2's 'Transaction.updated' method resulting in duplicate calls to the shipping API. My current treatment is to only add '-paymentQueue:updatedTransactions:' to listen for unfinished transactions. Even if the user is using StoreKit2 to initiate the payment, if the transaction is not Finished, it will be fetched via this method after restarting the app to process this transaction. Is this approach feasible and are there any best practices for this scenario? To summarize: Is it feasible to fetch unfinished StoreKit2 transactions via Original StoreKit methods when StoreKit2 coexists with Original StoreKit? Is there a recommended way

Hi, I tried to follow this guide: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/filtering-traffic-by-url And this: https://github.com/apple/pir-service-example I already deploy the pir service on my server. And set the configuration on the app like this: { name = SimpleURLFilter identifier = xxxxx applicationName = SimpleURLFilter application = com.xxxx.SimpleURLFilter grade = 2 urlFilter = { Enabled = YES FailClosed = NO AppBundleIdentifier = com.mastersystem.SimpleURLFilter ControlProviderBundleIdentifier = com.xxxx.SimpleURLFilter.SimpleURLFilterExtension PrefilterFetchFrequency = 2700 pirServerURL = https://xxxxx/pir pirPrivacyPassIssuerURL = https://xxxxx/pir AuthenticationToken = AAAA pirPrivacyProxyFailOpen = NO pirSkipRegistration = NO } } But I got this error when I tried to enable the service on the app: Received filter status change: <FilterStatus: 'stopped' errorMessage: 'The operation couldn’t be completed. (NetworkExtension.NEURLFilterManager.Error error 9.)'> What does that error mean? And how to fix it?

Hello, I am unable to use TestFlight for any app (existing or new), while production uploads work normally. All TestFlight actions fail with: ENTITY_UNPROCESSABLE.BETA_CONTRACT_MISSING There are no pending agreements in App Store Connect. This is an older account that previously used TestFlight successfully. This appears to be a missing or detached TestFlight Beta contract on Apple’s backend. Could this be manually reattached or re-provisioned? This is time-sensitive, as I need a TestFlight external testers link to submit an app for an upcoming hackathon. Apple Support case ID (for reference): 102817552619 Thank you.

I'm on macOS Sequoia Version 15.7.3 (24G419) and using Xcode Version 26.2 (17C52). In my Xcode project, Transaction.updates and Product.SubscriptionInfo.Status.updates don’t seem to emit updates reliably. The code below works consistently in a fresh Xcode project using a minimal setup with a local StoreKit Configuration file containing a single auto-renewable subscription. class InAppPurchaseManager { static let shared = InAppPurchaseManager() var transactionTask: Task<Void, Never>? var subscriptionTask: Task<Void, Never>? init() { print("Launched InAppPurchaseManager...") transactionTask = Task(priority: .background) { for await result in Transaction.updates { print("\nReceived transaction update...") try? await result.payloadValue.finish() } } subscriptionTask = Task(priority: .background) { for await result in Product.SubscriptionInfo.Status.updates { print("\nReceived subscription update...") print("state:", result.state.localizedDescription) } } } } I initialise it in: func applicationDidFinishLaunching(_ aNotification: Notification) { _ = InAppPurchaseManager.shared } I do not build any UI for this test. I open StoreKit Transaction Manager then click Create Transaction → select the product → choose Purchase (Default) → Next → Done. The console shows that it detects the initial purchase, renewals and finishes each transaction. It also works even if I do not add the In-App Purchase capability. In my actual project, the initial purchase is detected and finished, but renewals are not detected. Subsequent transactions then appear as unverified, presumably because the updates are not being observed so the transactions are not being finished. What can I do to make this work reliably in my actual project? For context, in the actual project: I have a StoreKit Configuration file that is synced with App Store Connect The In-App Purchase capability is enabled The configuration file is selected in the scheme The products in App Store Connect show “Ready to Submit” Loading products works: try await Product.products(for: ...) Also, I use ProductView for the purchase UI. The first purchase works and is detected and finished, but subsequent renewals are not finished because the updates do not seem to be emitted.

I have a problem when applying rotationEffect to a map in in SwiftUI. The legal text in the map is transformed as shown in this image: The following code is part of a much larger and complex view; it is a minimal example to reproduce the error: import SwiftUI import MapKit struct ContentView: View { @State private var offset = CGSize.zero var body: some View { ZStack { let drag = DragGesture() .onChanged { g in offset.width = g.translation.width offset.height = g.translation.height } Map(interactionModes: [.zoom]) .frame(width: 320, height: 220) .rotationEffect(.degrees(Double(offset.width / 12))) .highPriorityGesture(drag) } } } I hope you can help me with this problem.

I’ve seen, mainly in discussions with AIs, that ARFaceTrackingConfiguration uses the same technology as Face ID and therefore should work in complete darkness. However, I haven’t been able to achieve this. Does anyone know if this is actually true? I'm using an iPhone 16 to test, and the Face ID works well in darkness.

Among requirements to transfer app there is one called "clear all builds and testers and empty all fields under Test Information" under TestFlight but it seems there has been an update to appstore internal code as now I simply can't clear any field under Test Information as error pop ups "There are one or more errors on page." requiring me to fill them. How do I transfer apps now?

I received my approval for FairPlay Streaming (FPS) and was getting things organized and then my computer crashed. So... Yes, I lost the 32 digit Account Security Key (ASk) that I was warned not to lose repeatedly... I understand that I can't query apple for the existing ASk. I don't see where I can delete the existing cert to request another one. So I assume I'll need to start from scratch either with another FPS approval process. Can someone please direct me on next steps for this boneheaded situation. Thank you

Hello Apple Developers and users I am writing this message reguarding some help on some performance codes/settings I can use for my Macbook since I recently downloaded the MacOs Tahoe 26.2 and its been very glitchy and laggy with gaming and just using my mac normally I have tried using a FPS unlocker and downloading Metal 4 the FPS unlocker hasent worked at all I am still stuck on the normal 60 FPS and need some advice/help. Thank you. Kind regards Zachary

Hello, I am having a recurring issue using Swift Playgrounds version 4.6.4 on macOS 26.1. Upon opening a file and every other time I start typing in the code section I get a prompt, the image below, two or three times. It doesn't matter if I accept or decline all or some of the prompts, as soon as I start typing on another line I get prompted another two or three times for permission. It appears to me that prompt generates every time the preview pane tries to update. Declining the prompt breaks the preview but accepting the prompt only gets you through a single line of code before it appears again. I believe this issue started after I updated to macOS26.1 as I had not encountered it before. I've also opened other files with Swift Playgrounds and encounter the same problem. It could also be unrelated to the update and could be an issue with some permission setting somewhere, however, I have been unable to find what or where it could be. Is anyone else experiencing this? Thank you for your time :)