Overview

My cousin implanted an itch I'd like to scratch. She does some academic psycho-neurological research that I don't fully understand. But in talking it sounds like mixed reality in the AVP might facilitate a type of research that she's pursuing. I just don't know if such a thing is currently possible with the AVP given how it treats physically moving frames of reference. The idea is to have subjects in a motion vehicle simulator rig, able to operate it and see the interior of the vehicle/gauges/etc. But at times and in specific ways, obscure the views out of the "windows" of the vehicle. The obvious problem here is that the AVP doesn't like being in a dynamically moving frame of reference. This seems to be beyond what "travel mode" is intended for. They need to bump and turn the subjects to get the responses they're studying, so not a smooth ride like on a plane or train. The interior of the simulator rig is a "known object" and can be modeled. I just watched the new video about training/tracking a hand-held object via Create ML. Could a similar approach from a hand-held object be applied to the user's surroundings - the mocked up vehicle interior and its window frames? We'd then apply an obscuring blur or even just an opaque polygon to that "window" while the simulator rig (and thus the user) is in motion? The alignment of the blur/polygon doesn't need to have perfect tracking and registration. Update rate does not need to be low millisecond, but full second updates might make motion sickness worse. Also, am I correct in inferring that object tracking should be free from major drift over the course of tens of minutes? A stretch: would it be possible to counteract the illumination from room light sources so that the movement of light/dark is reduced on the interior of the "vehicle" while it is moving? I also noticed in the new "Explore enhancements to visionOS object tracking" video that some of the effect of overlaying MR elements onto something that is visually passed through is being demonstrated on an iPhone. Could a proof of concept of this app(?) be "mocked up" using an iPhone as a basis to justify the expense of buying the AVP? Hold the phone while the rig is moving, track the interior and blur/"open" the windows as seen on the phone screen?

Are there any Kerberos feature or behavior changes in macOS 27?

Can you share the reasons why the new payment model for subscriptions is not supported in the US? Maybe this is coming in the future but not announced yet. I didn't see anything in the StoreKit announcements saying it was extended but that doesn't mean I didn't miss something.

"My iPhone's battery health reading seems off. Even though it says 80% health, it instantly drops from 40% to 1%. The charge cycle count is already at 903."♻️

Since i got the iPadOS27 update signed in the waitlist and haven’t got any new yet

Hey all, the codex sign in isn't working for me in Agents. I am using the 26.5 release candidate version. It always says "Not Signed In". I have completed the Sign In process multiple times. Anyone else seeing this? I have filed Feedback FB22732574

Hi all - figured I would kick off with a CloudKit question. Recently in development of a multi-device app I got into a state where all iOS devices could not write to the (production) CloudKit container - however macOS could still write (multi-device SwiftUI code). After ruling out a lot of other things it seemed like there had been some corruption in the production zone's PCS key chain. The only fix was deleting the zone from the CloudKit Console (safe for my pre-release beta data, but destructive). Is there a safer or developer-accessible recovery path for PCS chain corruption? Is this situation detectable earlier, or is there guidance on avoiding it during pre-release testing? The error in the logs in this scenario had "overallStatus":"USER_ERROR", "error":"BAD_REQUEST", "returnedRecordTypes":"_pcs_data".

Hello, We are contacting you regarding an issue we are currently experiencing during the App Review process related to In-App Purchases and StoreKit product retrieval. After extensive internal testing and investigation, we believe the behavior we are seeing is identical to the issue discussed in the following Apple Developer Forum thread: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/827016 Our application was rejected under Guideline 2.1 - Performance because the subscription plans reportedly failed to load during review. According to the review notes, the In-App Purchase product list appeared empty in the review environment, which prevented the paywall from loading correctly. We would like to provide additional technical context because, despite significant testing efforts on our side, we have been unable to reproduce this behavior outside of the App Review environment. The exact same binary that was reviewed by App Review has been thoroughly tested by us through TestFlight on multiple physical devices, including iPhone and iPad devices, using multiple Sandbox tester accounts and different network conditions. In all of our tests, the subscription system functions correctly and consistently. Specifically, we verified that: StoreKit successfully retrieves all configured subscription products RevenueCat offerings load correctly without timeout or empty states Localized pricing information is displayed properly Subscription packages appear correctly in the paywall UI Purchase flows complete successfully Restore purchases functionality works correctly Products are returned both on cold launch and repeated application launches The issue does not occur intermittently in TestFlight or Sandbox testing on our side We also carefully reviewed our App Store Connect configuration and verified the following items multiple times: All In-App Purchase subscriptions are attached to the submitted app version Product identifiers used in the application code exactly match the identifiers configured in App Store Connect All products are marked as “Cleared for Sale” Paid Applications Agreement has been accepted and remains active Tax and banking information are complete and active Subscription localization settings are configured properly Pricing information is active and visible The products are available in the storefronts being tested The submitted binary is identical to the binary tested successfully through TestFlight Additionally, we implemented defensive handling in the application to minimize the impact of temporary StoreKit failures. The application now includes: Retry logic for offerings retrieval Graceful fallback handling for empty offerings Protection against infinite loading states Additional RevenueCat and StoreKit logging UI fallbacks when products temporarily fail to load Despite these safeguards, the review feedback still indicates that the products are not being returned in the App Review environment. At this point, because the issue cannot be reproduced externally and only appears during App Review, we suspect there may be an intermittent or environment-specific issue affecting StoreKit product retrieval in the review sandbox environment. One important detail is that the exact same build consistently works in TestFlight immediately before and after submission. This makes the behavior particularly difficult for us to diagnose because there appears to be no configuration difference between our successful tests and the App Review scenario. We also understand from Apple documentation and previous App Review communication that In-App Purchases are tested within an Apple-provided sandbox environment. Based on the evidence currently available to us, the failure appears to occur specifically within that review sandbox process rather than within the application logic itself. If possible, we would greatly appreciate assistance with the following: Verifying whether StoreKit product retrieval is functioning correctly in the App Review sandbox environment Confirming whether the review device successfully established communication with App Store sandbox services Providing any available diagnostic logs related to the failed product request Confirming whether the product identifiers were visible to StoreKit during review Sharing any guidance on how we may reproduce the App Review behavior locally Clarifying whether there are known intermittent issues affecting StoreKit product loading during App Review We are fully committed to resolving the issue and ensuring complete compliance with App Store requirements. However, because the issue currently appears environment-specific and non-reproducible from our side, we are struggling to determine what additional changes are necessary. If there are any additional diagnostics, logging methods, StoreKit verification steps, or App Review recommendations you would like us to implement, we would be happy to do so immediately. Thank you very much for your assistance, support, and time. We sincerely appreciate your help in investigating this issue. Best regards, Mert Akgün

Is there any guidance for syncing records that have references to others regarding batching with the sync engine? For example, if I have hundreds of records to sync with many different types and references, do I need to keep track of how many records would be added because of reference properties? The sample and video doesn’t go into details about syncing records that have references to others so looking for lesser known rough edges.

Is redeeming an offer code during an active introductory free trial a supported flow with StoreKit?

In iOS 27, when a user has configured a custom AirPods EQ (three-band lows/mids/highs), does that EQ apply on top of audio output from AVAudioEngine in my app, or only to media playback through AVPlayer/MPMusicPlayerController? My app generates therapeutic frequencies (e.g. 528 Hz pure tones) where precise frequency output matters - is there any API to detect or opt out of the system AirPods EQ?

What would you recommend to teams that want to act as both a central and peripheral role? I want to use the ASK permission model for Central mode, but doing so I can't build connections to Apple Watch and Apple Vision Pro that don't support peripheral mode forcing the iPhone to do that.

What recommendation would you have for teams wanting to build a CloudKit integration in the cloud? For example, the backend writes data to the public database, users read it, controlled via security roles. CloudKit Web Services documentation has been archived for some time but the services still exist. Generating a client using Swift OpenAPI generator would be real slick. The same could be used in local tooling that has the server API key.

Are there good ways to guide an app to pause iCloud syncing if the app is busy with an intensive activity? Also, is there a way to suggest that it check iCloud for updates?

I just watched the "Build Intelligent Siri experiences with App Schemas" and I'm confused about how to integrate my app with the new Apple Intelligence + Siri in iOS27. I think it mentions specifically that Siri needs to adopt App Schemas, and that just adopting App Intents in my app isn't enough for it to integrate with the new Siri. Is that correct? The 'schemas' seem to be a narrow set of specific activities. What if my app's actions (or intents) don't match closely with it? For example, in my app, I have entities like Tags and Contacts. I can 'create tag' as well as 'add tags to a contact' as 2 different App intents. If I'm using just App Intents on their own, would these not map to the new Siri? I can also add a 'task' to a 'contact'. Would that possibly work with Siri? The videos just don't seem to make an effort to explain what is and what isn't possible.

SKTestSession configurations seem to have been broken starting in Xcode 26.3. The release notes for iOS 26.5 indicate that it was supposed to be fixed there, but I still haven't been able to get it to work. Is there something that has changed recently about how SKTestSession configurations need to be used?

With the new annual subscription billed monthly in iOS 27 — what's the StoreKit 2 implementation pattern, and how does App Store Server Notifications handle the monthly charge events versus the annual renewal event?

For a sleep app running 8–12 hours in background, is AVAudioSourceNode with a real-time render block more power-efficient than looping a pre-encoded audio file via AVAudioPlayerNode? I want to migrate from files to procedural synthesis but not at the cost of battery. What does Instruments / Energy Log show as the typical CPU overhead difference, and is there Apple guidance on this trade-off?

Hi everyone, Since today, all my Codex requests have been failing in both Xcode 26.5 and Xcode 27 beta. The Codex integration appears to be connected and authenticated correctly, but every request fails immediately with the error shown in the attached screenshot. Error message: The data couldn’t be read because it isn’t in the correct format.

Safari, Freeform and some other apps now support curved windows. It this now available to developers as well? I couldn't find any information about it. Thanks!