I slept on this issue overnight and thought it has something to do with the deployment of Xcode 26. It happens that it was released yesterday, I'm going to install Xcode 26 to see what happens.

I would delete existing subscription plans and create new ones with different reference names and product IDs. There was a time when existing IAP products went unusable after the reviewer rejected the app body itself. I guess that was a decade ago.

If there is something that I have never done before is that I have the TCA software package (ComposableArchitecture). I seldom use Swift packages. This time, I'm just trying to submit a new software title to test this 3rd-party framework.

init?(string: String) returns an optional value. guard let url = URL(string: "https://...") else { return } let request = URLRequest(url: url) URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: request) or guard let url = URL(string: "https://...") else { return } do { let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared.data(from: url) } catch { }

That's because you have selected 'System' as opposed to 'login' on the sidebar?

What happens if you apply the corner radius to your button guy?

I kind of remember that I had several applications running an FFMPEG command-line app submitted to Mac App Store some 14 years ago. In the meantime, you are not specific about your development platform, making ambiguous statements like "MacOs" and "AppStore." So which is it? Is it an iOS app or macOS application? Anyway, if you are not sure if your macOS submission does not abide by Mac App Store review guidelines, you can have your users download the command-line tool and install it on their own. I would search for 'DVD rip' at Mac App Store.

Thank you, App Review and Apple Appeals Board. The app in question has been approved. I'm taken by a surprise because there was a bitter time when Appeals Board used to take the side of the reviewer without questions and because I was ready to abandon this software submission. I don't know if the reviewer has changed his or her mind this time or if the Appeals Board has made their decision for me.

I don't see a line where you actually produce an output file. To my knowledge, you only produce an output image when you use CIFilter. Then you should apply one to your layer or whatever. That's not what you are doing.

Sure, App Review. I thank you. I don't have a problem and will submit changes if you kindly tell me that there may be a situation where they need to restore whatever they need without history of purchases. For now, I don't see it. And the reviewer or the appeals board doesn't give me a reason why they need to restore what. Again, I don't know what they are trying to restore.

I’m wondering if it fell through the cracks? It has never happened in the past 15 years or so to my knowledge. The only reason that I can think of as to why they delay in reviewing software submissions is that some of them are working on reviewing iOS or macOS updates.

The background color is there. But you are not giving much room around the TextField guy to show the focus effect. I would use the border guy instead of the background guy. struct ContentView: View { @FocusState private var focus: Bool @State private var text: String = "" var body: some View { ZStack { VStack { TextField("Enter phone number", text: $text) .focused($focus) .font(.system(size: 36.0)) .border(focus ? Color.yellow : Color.clear) .textFieldStyle(.roundedBorder) .padding() } } } } or struct ContentView: View { @FocusState private var focus: Bool @State private var text: String = "" var body: some View { ZStack { VStack { TextField("Enter phone number", text: $text) .focused($focus) .font(.system(size: 36.0)) .textFieldStyle(.roundedBorder) .padding() .background(focus ? .blue : .clear) } } } }

What's 43(b)? You mean, 4.3 (b)?