I have seen several spam rejection topics involving 'VPN.' Since you don't disclose the description and the keyword list of your submission, that's all you can tell you.

Our account was terminated our developer account under Section 3.2(f) What!? They don't appear to tell you what you have done. If I were Apple, Inc, I wouldn't explain, either, because you would choose to cheat in a more sophisticated manner so as not to get caught next time when you reapply for a developer account. You probably want to go over the section you are referring to to see if any part of it rings you a bell. If you are totally hopeless, you may want to read other similar topics by searching for 'rejection.'

Has anyone successfully resolved repeated rejections where App Review continued citing the same guideline after fixes were implemented? Yes and no. I don't know exactly how many times you suggest you have been rejected for the same guideline. I may have them repeat the same guideline violation twice or three times. Is there an effective way to request a conversation with an App Review representative or obtain more specific technical feedback? Yes and no. The only effective way is to fix an issue that they say is the issue. Since you don't go into specifics, that's all I can say. Are there any additional channels or approaches that have helped you break out of this cycle? Not really... But a google search? I have published about 450 software products over the last 15+ years. So I know how to get around, I guess. I have abandoned three or four submissions, though.

How is the license mode that you are referring to different from non-consumable IAP?

It's possible that you are caught in the midst of their latest anti-spam campaign where they reject multiple submissions all at a time in a matter of a few seconds. If you believe you are not getting anywhere, you may want to terminate your current submission, make some changes to the build and send a new build to review. And you may see their true face behind the unexplained delay. That's still better than a wall of silence.

Could someone from the App Review team please check whether this submission is still actively being processed, and whether any further action is required from my side? In case you didn't know, this isn't a support website. And reviewers don't come here according to site administrators.

let cgImage = CGWindowListCreateImage(CGRectNull, [.optionIncludingWindow], cgWin, [.bestResolution]) Why do you set the screenBounds property to CGRectNull? Besides, this function is deprecated. Though it's a bit difficult to use, why don't you use the ScreenCaptureKit framework, instead?

The reviewer writes the app may include features or characteristics that distinguish it. So you need to make it distinguished from others. Otherwise, you will continue to get rejected. In the worst case, you may get your developer account terminated if you continue to make a submission without noticeable changes.

You must not be familiar with app store submission In the past 15 and a half years, I have gotten more than 400 Mac applications and iOS apps approved.

That's not unusual since you say that you voluntarily went back to the end of the queue. You should have waited in the line. An average wait time can be as long as two to three weeks now to my knowledge.

The blog comment support approach was acceptable 15 years ago. It's still acceptable today. I don't remember whether or not I filed an appeal afterwords, but Rejection has been overturned. I'm not the one violating guidelines. The blame should go to the reviewer who cuts corners by relying on bots with no eyes. I've published 20+ apps This submission was probably my No. 400.

I submitted an app for beta app review. What is the thing that you refer to as the beta app review? If you casually use the word 'beta,' that action alone will prompt them to reject your submission. It is not possible to provide webauthn credentials like this. I don't know what 'this' is or why that's is not possible, but they are not going to take your word at its face value. If I were you, I would show them a screen-capture video to show them how things are put altogether.

I replied in the review thread with a point-by-point response to each 4.3(a) factor and asked which app mine is believed to resemble You've asked what!? Which app of yours? You've said it's your only app. These days, they let a bot reject your submission a few seconds after they start reviewing it if the category you have chosen is very crowded. They are out of hand. I guess you have to tell them under the App information section how unique your app is, which sounds totally absurd, though, because you have to know how other apps similar to yours work.

Unless you show the description and the list of keywords, there is little that someone knows why your 10-year-old desktop application has been rejected. But let me suppose that the description says that you can create an official password photo size. If that's the case, it should raise a red flag unless you have proof that you are representing a government. Also, somebody mentioned that their passport app or application had been rejected at Reddit or somewhere several days ago. You probably want to run a search.

Your app may be different from other dating apps. But your topic is pretty much the same as those of dating apps being rejected as spams. There is no app description. There is no list of keywords. You don't state the exact rejection statement. You don't seem to have read other topics under the same circumstances.